TOK - Language
You are using language right now. Not just to read these words - to think. The sentence you just processed became a thought before you consciously decided what to do with it. Language is so close to thinking that it is difficult to see where one ends and the other begins. That difficulty is exactly what makes it interesting for TOK. The Language optional theme does not treat language as a neutral tool that carries knowledge from one person to another, like water through a pipe. Language shapes what can be known, who gets to know it, and what happens when someone uses it in a particular way at a particular moment.
The four pages of this theme take language apart along the four axes of the TOK framework. Each page builds on the last, and each ends by handing something to the next. By the time you reach Ethics, you will be asking questions about naming and power that only make sense because of what Scope, Perspectives, and Methods established first.
The four pages of this theme take language apart along the four axes of the TOK framework. Each page builds on the last, and each ends by handing something to the next. By the time you reach Ethics, you will be asking questions about naming and power that only make sense because of what Scope, Perspectives, and Methods established first.
|
1. Scope: What is language - and where does it end?
Before asking what language does, we need to know what counts as language. The definition fails immediately - signed languages, mathematical notation, music, animal communication all trouble the boundary. The most interesting question is not where the line falls but what the edge cases reveal. The Scope page ends with the Sapir-Whorf hypothesis: does the language you speak shape what you can think? If so, the question of what language is becomes a question about the limits of your own mind. |
|
2 Perspectives in Language - Whose language counts?
Not all languages carry equal weight in the production of knowledge. Some are the language of science, law, and international institutions. Others are endangered, suppressed, or simply absent from the rooms where decisions are made. The Perspectives page asks what happens to the knowledge encoded in a language when that language loses its speakers - and whose interests are served by which languages being at the centre. This is not just a question about linguistics. It is a question about power. |
|
3 Methods and Tools in Language - How does language produce knowledge - and what escapes it?
Language is a method for producing and sharing knowledge. But it is not the only one, and it has limits. Michael Polanyi argued that we know more than we can tell - that a vast proportion of expert knowledge lives in the body and in practice rather than in words. Maurice Merleau-Ponty showed why: the body itself is a knowing subject. The Methods page asks what kind of knowledge language produces, what kind it cannot reach, and what the tools of linguistic analysis - from the spectrograph to corpus linguistics to brain imaging - reveal about how language works as a cognitive technology. |
|
4 Ethics in Language - Who has the authority to name - what happens to those who name differently?
Language is not ethically neutral. J. L. Austin showed that some utterances do not describe reality but act on it - they create obligations, wound, command, condemn. Orwell showed that language can be engineered to make atrocity manageable. The Ethics page opens with a question about the word "genocide" - not about what happened, but about who has the power to name it, and what it costs those who refuse. From speech act theory to the reclamation of slurs, from Newspeak to hermeneutical injustice, this page asks: given what language can do, what are we responsible for when we use it? |
Three figures run through all four pages. Miranda Fricker - whose concept of epistemic injustice shows how language and power interact - appears first in Lesson 1 of the core course and returns here at every stage. George Orwell's essay "Politics and the English Language" (1946) is referenced in Perspectives, Methods, and Ethics; it is worth reading once, early, and returning to. And the question of translation - what crosses between languages and what does not - connects Scope (untranslatable words), Perspectives (whose translation counts), Methods (Quine's radical translation), and Ethics (the politics of naming across cultures and legal systems). These are not separate topics given the same label. They are four angles on the same question: what does it mean to know something in a language?
|
Lesson on language from 11e
Finally, this is a reminder that we covered some important language ground two years ago. The Year 11 lesson on language began with words that cannot be translated - and asked why. Each untranslatable word is a record of something a culture noticed and named: a gap where English has not been. From cricketing metaphors and the Norman Conquest to the Sapir-Whorf hypothesis: if the language available to you shapes what you can think, how do you know you mean what you say? |