How important was the development of technology to the changing nature of warfare in the period 1500-2000?
You are going to write a short (ideally 600-800 words), evaluative essay which addresses the question in 40 minutes. This page is designed to help you plan your response. Everything you need to write this essay can be found in lessons 4-10 in this section of the website. You need to plan your essay in two steps.
You are going to write a short (ideally 600-800 words), evaluative essay which addresses the question in 40 minutes. This page is designed to help you plan your response. Everything you need to write this essay can be found in lessons 4-10 in this section of the website. You need to plan your essay in two steps.
Step 1 - researching the relevance
There are basically three questions to consider, each of which is progressively more difficult:
Which wars are relevant? When did warfare change? What caused this change?
There are basically three questions to consider, each of which is progressively more difficult:
Which wars are relevant? When did warfare change? What caused this change?
1. What does “technology” mean in warfare?
In this topic, technology refers to the tools, weapons, and equipment used in war, and the scientific or industrial developments that made them possible. Technology changes how armies fight, how fast they can move, how deadly weapons are, and sometimes even whether a battle happens at all.
1500–1700 - Gunpowder (cannons, arquebuses): destroyed medieval castles, changed siege warfare. Caravel ships: allowed Europeans to cross oceans and conquer the Americas.
1700–1815 - Flintlock muskets: more reliable than matchlocks. Bayonets: allowed infantry to replace the pike.
1815–1900 - Rifled barrels: longer range and accuracy. Railways and telegraph: rapid troop movement and communication. Machine guns (Maxim gun): made imperial conquest easier.
1900–1945 - Tanks: broke trench stalemate. Aircraft: reconnaissance, bombing, and blitzkrieg. Poison gas: psychological and physical terror.
1945–2000 - Nuclear weapons: created deterrence (MAD). Television and mass media: influenced public opinion in Vietnam. Computers / satellites: improved intelligence and precision.
Why technology matters: It can make armies more powerful. It can make old tactics obsolete. It can force countries to change strategy. Sometimes it completely transforms the nature of war (e.g., nuclear weapons). But technology is not the only cause of change...
2. What are “non-technological factors”?
These are the ideas, beliefs, social changes, political systems, and individuals that also shape warfare. Non-technological factors explain why wars happen, how societies fight, and what they believe war is for. Think of these as the human reasons war changes.
Types of non-technological factors - PESC+ individuals
(a) Political change. Rise of nation-states → larger, more organised armies (1700–1815). Totalitarian regimes (Nazi Germany, USSR) → “total war” (1900–1945). Decolonisation → guerrilla wars (1945–2000).
(b) Social change. Collapse of feudalism (1500–1700). Growth of nationalism (1800s). Mass conscription in WWI/WWII.
(c) Cultural change. Wars of religion in the 1600s. Racial ideas in imperialism and Nazi ideology. Cultural beliefs leading to dehumanisation of the enemy.
(d) Economic change. Industrial Revolution → mass-produced weapons (2nd generation warfare). Cost of war encourages new strategies (e.g., limited wars, Cold War deterrence).
(e) Key individuals Ideas or leadership from: Henry Dunant (Red Cross, Geneva Convention) Napoleon (military reform) von Moltke (railway mobilisation). Ho Chi Minh in Vietnam (guerrilla warfare thinking + 4th generation warfare)
Why non-technological factors matter. People’s ideas can be more powerful than weapons. New forms of government change who fights and why. Ideologies can make wars more total, more violent, or more limited. Leaders can transform strategy without inventing new weapons. Social change affects recruitment, morale, and national purpose.
In this topic, technology refers to the tools, weapons, and equipment used in war, and the scientific or industrial developments that made them possible. Technology changes how armies fight, how fast they can move, how deadly weapons are, and sometimes even whether a battle happens at all.
1500–1700 - Gunpowder (cannons, arquebuses): destroyed medieval castles, changed siege warfare. Caravel ships: allowed Europeans to cross oceans and conquer the Americas.
1700–1815 - Flintlock muskets: more reliable than matchlocks. Bayonets: allowed infantry to replace the pike.
1815–1900 - Rifled barrels: longer range and accuracy. Railways and telegraph: rapid troop movement and communication. Machine guns (Maxim gun): made imperial conquest easier.
1900–1945 - Tanks: broke trench stalemate. Aircraft: reconnaissance, bombing, and blitzkrieg. Poison gas: psychological and physical terror.
1945–2000 - Nuclear weapons: created deterrence (MAD). Television and mass media: influenced public opinion in Vietnam. Computers / satellites: improved intelligence and precision.
Why technology matters: It can make armies more powerful. It can make old tactics obsolete. It can force countries to change strategy. Sometimes it completely transforms the nature of war (e.g., nuclear weapons). But technology is not the only cause of change...
2. What are “non-technological factors”?
These are the ideas, beliefs, social changes, political systems, and individuals that also shape warfare. Non-technological factors explain why wars happen, how societies fight, and what they believe war is for. Think of these as the human reasons war changes.
Types of non-technological factors - PESC+ individuals
(a) Political change. Rise of nation-states → larger, more organised armies (1700–1815). Totalitarian regimes (Nazi Germany, USSR) → “total war” (1900–1945). Decolonisation → guerrilla wars (1945–2000).
(b) Social change. Collapse of feudalism (1500–1700). Growth of nationalism (1800s). Mass conscription in WWI/WWII.
(c) Cultural change. Wars of religion in the 1600s. Racial ideas in imperialism and Nazi ideology. Cultural beliefs leading to dehumanisation of the enemy.
(d) Economic change. Industrial Revolution → mass-produced weapons (2nd generation warfare). Cost of war encourages new strategies (e.g., limited wars, Cold War deterrence).
(e) Key individuals Ideas or leadership from: Henry Dunant (Red Cross, Geneva Convention) Napoleon (military reform) von Moltke (railway mobilisation). Ho Chi Minh in Vietnam (guerrilla warfare thinking + 4th generation warfare)
Why non-technological factors matter. People’s ideas can be more powerful than weapons. New forms of government change who fights and why. Ideologies can make wars more total, more violent, or more limited. Leaders can transform strategy without inventing new weapons. Social change affects recruitment, morale, and national purpose.
Make a copy of the following planning sheet but replace the sections in red with explanations and examples of your own. By guided by the questions I ask and use some of the examples above to help you.
Period and turning point |
Technology important to the changing nature of war |
Non-technology very important to the changing nature of war |
One of the defining characteristics of the end of the middle ages is the development of gunpowder. Why did gunpowder lead to less castle building? Why was gunpowder important to the European conquistadors? |
How did the end of feudalism change the nature of warfare? Why did Europeans colonise the Americas? Why were there wars of religion? How did this impact on the nature of war in this period? |
|
Innovations included the addition of a bayonet to the musket which was now flintlock rather than matchlock. But how significant to the changing nature of warfare? |
Politically Europe began to centralise into nation states and war became something expensive and better avoided. How did the Enlightenment encouraged this? How did the two revolutions (USA/ France) and Napoleon change the world and with it the nature of warfare? |
|
This was a period when war was most transformed by technology. The first industrial revolution changed weapons and transport beyond recognition. What examples should be chosen? |
Morality enters the battlefield with Henry Dunant. How did this change the nature of war? Other individuals also change war: von Moltke, Dreyse, Maxim and Russell. Why were nationalism and imperialism new important ideas? |
|
The industrialisation and mechanisation of warfare continues apace and the nature of war moves from the static trenches to the blitzkrieg of aircraft and tanks. Again what are most important examples? |
Again new ideas are important: communism and fascism and their political totalitarian states. Why does 'total war' change the ethics of war? Are any more individuals important? |
|
We enter the nuclear age of the mutually assured destruction (MAD) of deterrence. Why in the guerilla wars in Asia, Africa and Latin America does the idea of a battlefield almost cease to exist? Fourth generation war relies on mass media and public perceptions. Why? |
The Cold War is a battle of ideologies between two superpowers and the beginning of the long-peace. Why does decolonisation and independence movements result in new types of war? Did new international organisations (UN/EU) reduce the extent of war? |
Step 2 - Identifying the big points and organising the paragraphs
Select from the explanations and examples from step one and try to combine them into a series of big points so the paragraph is PEE'd. (Point, explanation and example).
Technology cannot always explain the changing nature of warfare. The impact of cultural beliefs has been important because it has led to particularly violent wars because the enemy is perceived as less than human. This dehumanisation has led for example to the conquistadors in America in the 15th century, Europeans in Africa during the age of imperialism and Nazi Germany in World War II. In each case human life has been taken with little concern for the victims.
The red sentence addresses the question. The paragraph would continue with more green explanations and blue examples.
Technology cannot always explain the changing nature of warfare. The impact of cultural beliefs has been important because it has led to particularly violent wars because the enemy is perceived as less than human. This dehumanisation has led for example to the conquistadors in America in the 15th century, Europeans in Africa during the age of imperialism and Nazi Germany in World War II. In each case human life has been taken with little concern for the victims.
The red sentence addresses the question. The paragraph would continue with more green explanations and blue examples.
Step 3 - Planning the structure of the essay.
At least one paragraph must be dedicated to dealing with the question of technology (you cannot avoid technology because it is in the question!) but you now to decide what other factors (big points) you are going to evaluate (measure importance of) in comparison to the importance of technology. The paragraph in Step 2 suggests the importance of cultural causes but what else can you think of? Again look at the notes above to help you. You need at least one more factor, ideally two or even more.
At least one paragraph must be dedicated to dealing with the question of technology (you cannot avoid technology because it is in the question!) but you now to decide what other factors (big points) you are going to evaluate (measure importance of) in comparison to the importance of technology. The paragraph in Step 2 suggests the importance of cultural causes but what else can you think of? Again look at the notes above to help you. You need at least one more factor, ideally two or even more.
Introduction Briefly outline (signpost) what you are going to say below in paragraphs 2 and 3. |
Paragraph 2 Make your big point and explain and provide examples for the argument you don't think is less persuasive |
Paragraph 3 Make your big point and explain and provide examples for the argument you think is more convincing |
Conclusion Restate your main argument from the introduction and explain why you either agree or disagree with the question. The best answers will also be able to explain why they have reached the conclusion and why. |
Step 4 - Write your essay in 40 minutes in class without notes. Click here to begin.
Marking rubric
The essay must demonstrate an understanding of the changing nature of warfare between 1500 and 2000, and it should evaluate the relative importance of technological and non-technological factors in driving those changes. The essay should go beyond simply listing changes and should analyze how and why warfare evolved. The essay must address the question of 'how important' by recognising that it was not only technology that changed warfare
The essay must demonstrate an understanding of the changing nature of warfare between 1500 and 2000, and it should evaluate the relative importance of technological and non-technological factors in driving those changes. The essay should go beyond simply listing changes and should analyze how and why warfare evolved. The essay must address the question of 'how important' by recognising that it was not only technology that changed warfare
Key Areas for Assessment
Understanding of Technological Developments: How well does the essay identify and explain the impact of specific technologies (e.g., gunpowder, firearms, tanks, planes, nuclear weapons)?
Understanding of Non-Technological Factors: How well does the essay consider non-technological factors such as political, social, religious, and cultural changes or the role of individuals or new ideas and how these impacted warfare?
Analytical and Evaluative Skills: Does the essay analyse the changing nature of warfare? Does it evaluate the relative importance of different factors? Does it move beyond a simple description of the changes?
Use of Evidence: How effectively does the essay use examples to support claims?
Structure and Clarity: How well is the essay structured? Is the argument clear and logical?
Understanding of Technological Developments: How well does the essay identify and explain the impact of specific technologies (e.g., gunpowder, firearms, tanks, planes, nuclear weapons)?
Understanding of Non-Technological Factors: How well does the essay consider non-technological factors such as political, social, religious, and cultural changes or the role of individuals or new ideas and how these impacted warfare?
Analytical and Evaluative Skills: Does the essay analyse the changing nature of warfare? Does it evaluate the relative importance of different factors? Does it move beyond a simple description of the changes?
Use of Evidence: How effectively does the essay use examples to support claims?
Structure and Clarity: How well is the essay structured? Is the argument clear and logical?
